10/22/2023 0 Comments Mastering uncomfortable conversations"Time and time again, you see that the chance to bounce your ideas off other people with at least a receptiveness to being wrong gives you more accuracy. The benefits of that extend beyond fostering more productive debates, Fisher says. Before digging in, set your own intentions, and remember that approaching the discussion with "an openness and willingness to learn," will make it more likely for your conversation partner to see how your position could be true as well, Fisher says. Keep that in mind the next time you find yourself in heated conversation, he suggests. It can also change the other person's point of view - a rarity in our polarized times. One of his key takeaways from the study is that approaching hot-button issues from an "arguing to learn" mentality can help shift your own thinking. That's a common impulse, Fisher says, but you may be neglecting the bigger picture. There's a good chance you were solely focused on the content of the argument, not why you were debating in the first place. Think back to the last time you argued with someone. Go into arguments with 'an openness and willingness to learn' People who were "arguing to win" took a hard line and only saw one right answer, while those who "argued to learn" were more likely to accept opinions that were different from their own.Īrguing to learn is ultimately a mentality, not a single set of tactics, and the key to doing it effectively rests on understanding why it matters in the first place. That mentality can hold the key to success: Research shows open-minded people perceive the world around them differently, leading to an increase in happiness and creativity.įisher hypothesized that those in the "arguing to learn" group would be less likely to believe there was a single, set answer to the debate at hand - and the study confirmed his theory. One group was instructed to adopt a competitive mentality in order to "win" the argument, while the other group was told to "argue to learn."Īn "arguing to learn" mentality rests in viewing contentious conversations as collaborative exchanges that can deepen your understanding of a given topic, rather than battles to be won. The setup was simple: Participants had to debate hot-button topics in an online chatroom. Fisher and his fellow researchers on the 2016 study set out to determine if someone's approach to arguments can impact how they understand the nature of truth when it comes to a given debate topic.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |